Printable View
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sean, a good teacher would not intrduce a class of five year olds to ANY kind of sex relationships, gay or straight.Quote:
Originally posted by Sean Pa:
We agree to disagree then Jumper, I still think 5 is too young to be introduced to same sex relationships you dont, Fair enough, I`ve never claimed to be right.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sean, a good teacher would not intrduce a class of five year olds to ANY kind of sex relationships, gay or straight.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I completley agree, its just the nature of the school encourages interaction between Pupils and Teachers and partners at fundraisers ect, and you could just see the questions arising.Quote:
Originally posted by Gunslinger:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sean, a good teacher would not intrduce a class of five year olds to ANY kind of sex relationships, gay or straight.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I completley agree, its just the nature of the school encourages interaction between Pupils and Teachers and partners at fundraisers ect, and you could just see the questions arising.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok, what kind of questions are we talking about. A good teacher (gay or straight) won't talk about their relationships at fundraisers either. Nor will they engage in public displays of affection (PDA).Quote:
Originally posted by Sean Pa:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Gunslinger:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
[quote]Originally posted by reason:
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's only b/c you are reading it into what he is saying. All he has are questions. YOU are the one that is turning it into something that it isn't. Nowhere did I see him call you or other gays pedophiles. Nowhere did I see where he said gays should be banned from anything. He said that some jobs would be difficult for gays. That's not different than saying some jobs out there would be difficult for me b/c I'm fat.Quote:
A lot can be read into Sean's message, and all of it is scary.
You know, the more I read from you the more it seems like you feel that everyone is out to get you just b/c you are gay. That's not it at all. Some of your posts have been immature, moronic and hurtful. Being gay has nothing to do with that. Hell, you accused me of calling you a pedophile when I did no such thing. I merely asked a question that has been put out there by other people in other places and you automatically assumed the worst without asking for a clarification. Hell, when I apologized for being vague in that thread, you never even acknowledged that at all. No, 'thanks for clarifying' or anything.
Why is it that you feel that you can run people down all you want and not have to pay the price for it, but when someone does the exact same thing to you, they need to stop immediately b/c the only reason they are doing it is b/c you are gay. That's b.s. and you know it.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I wholeheartedly disagree, Reason. Someone like you would not be.Quote:
Before you know it, someone like me would be banned for a host of reasons from assorted professions like counseling, sports and recreation, teaching, ministry, nursing, assorted health care, food service (disease), public service, and a bunch of others.
We're back to what I said upthread about how most straight people are exposed to only militant gays. We're also back to what I said upthread about gay not equalling pedophile.
I wouldn't want anyone like reason teaching future children of my own. Not because he's gay but because he is bigotted, narrow minded and uses stereotypes to define people. Like GS pointed out, he throws out comments left and right and then hides behind his gayness. He's a whining, leftist, homophobic jerk. And since he also happens to be gay that means he's self-loathing on top of it. Not sure what happened to him from when he used to post on here and when he came back. But in the transition I have lost any and all respect I had for him. He's a loser. And that's why I have him on "ignore". Not sure why the rest of you waste your time answering him.
Reason reason reason, you really do read a lot more into my posts than was originally intended.
Trust me I`m the good guy.
many years ago Women were looking for equality and got it, Rightly so. But speak to SOME Firefighters, Policemen,Soldiers and a lot will tell you, Equality has gone too far.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok, I'm sure I'm taking this out of context, but I laughed when I read this. No offense, but I thought it was funny.Quote:
Equality has gone too far
of course your taking it out of context. you always do.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok, I'm sure I'm taking this out of context, but I laughed when I read this. No offense, but I thought it was funny.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Actually in some cases it has. A prime example is womens tennis. They want the same amount of prize money as the men, yet they still only play the best of 3 sets whereas the men play best of 5 sets. Why should the women get the same pay for less 'work'. If they want the same amount of prize money they need to play a best of 5 just like the men do.Quote:
Originally posted by reason:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Equality has gone too far